- FPL Brain
- Posts
- FPL Brain Early Look for GW8
FPL Brain Early Look for GW8
Free Hit suggestions, Captain Picks, and Overall/Differential picks
Free-Hitting This Week?
🧤 Goalkeeper
Raya (Arsenal vs Fulham)
Fulham’s xG is 23% below the league average, so their attack poses minimal threat.
Their xGC is 2% above average, meaning Arsenal should dominate, keeping pressure off Raya and boosting clean-sheet odds.
🛡️ Defenders
Chalobah (Chelsea vs Nott’m Forest)
Forest’s xGC is 36% above the league average, a great matchup for defenders with attacking threat.
Strong defensive output (9.75/90) with attacking upside (xGI 0.24).
Forest’s xG is 6% above average, a minor risk but manageable given Chelsea’s control.
J. Timber (Arsenal vs Fulham)
xGI 0.40/90 is excellent for a defender.
Fulham’s xG is 23% below average, making this a top clean-sheet fixture.
Slightly weak opponent defense (xGC +2% vs. average) allows Timber to stay advanced.
Struijk (Leeds vs Burnley)
Burnley’s xG is 19% below average, suggesting a strong chance of a clean sheet.
Burnley’s xGC is 47% above average, so Leeds will spend much of the match attacking.
High defensive work rate (8.14/90) gives a solid floor.
⚙️ Midfielders
Enzo (Chelsea vs Nott’m Forest)
xGI 0.62/90 with a 36% above-average xGC opponent makes this a standout matchup.
Forest’s xG is 6% above average, but Chelsea should still control the game.
M. Salah (Liverpool vs Man Utd)
Consistent xGI 0.42/90 in a fixture where United’s xGC is 11% above the league average — slightly better-than-neutral for attackers.
United’s xG is 26% above average, meaning an open game that suits Salah’s style.
Semenyo (Bournemouth vs Crystal Palace)
xGI 0.57/90 against a defense just 2% below average in xGC — close to neutral.
Palace’s xG is 31% above average, suggesting an end-to-end match that could open up space for attacking returns.
Schade (Brentford vs West Ham)
xGI 0.33/90 with West Ham’s xGC 25% above the league average makes this a strong fixture for attacking players.
West Ham’s xG is 31% below average, minimizing defensive exposure.
Ndiaye (Everton vs Man City)
Decent xGI 0.49/90, but City’s xGC is 15% below average, one of the toughest matchups in the league.
City’s xG is 73% above average, so Everton will spend most of the game defending — not ideal for returns.
⚽ Forwards
Haaland (Man City vs Everton)
xGI 1.25/90, the highest in the league.
Everton’s xGC is 10% above average, a favorable defensive matchup.
Everton’s xG is 24% above average, which could create a high-tempo game where Haaland thrives.
Thiago (Brentford vs West Ham)
xGI 0.47/90 with West Ham’s xGC 25% above average — clear attacking upside.
West Ham’s xG is 31% below average, meaning Brentford should dominate possession.
✅ Summary:
High-upside attackers: Haaland, Enzo, Salah, Timber, Thiago
Strong defensive foundations: Raya, Timber, Struijk
Balanced differential: Chalobah — strong two-way potential vs. a weak Forest defense (+36% xGC vs. average)
Overall Best and Differential Picks for Next 3 Gameweeks
Captain Picks
xGI/90 1.25
Attack 100%
xGI/90 0.62
Attack 98%
xGI/90 0.72
Attack 97%
xGI/90 0.57
Attack 96%
xGI/90 0.47
Attack 97%
⚔️ Overall Defenders
xGI/90 0.4 · Def contribs/90 7.77
Attack 95% · Defend 95%
(Fulham, Crystal Palace, Burnley)
xGI/90 0.08 · Def contribs/90 9.43
Attack 95% · Defend 96%
(Fulham, Crystal Palace, Burnley)
xGI/90 0.18 · Def contribs/90 12.84
Attack 64% · Defend 81%
(Crystal Palace, Nott'm Forest, Man City)
xGI/90 0.24 · Def contribs/90 9.75
Attack 69% · Defend 87%
(Nott'm Forest, Sunderland, Spurs)
xGI/90 0.35 · Def contribs/90 4.98
Attack 95% · Defend 96%
(Fulham, Crystal Palace, Burnley)
🎨 Overall Midfielders
xGI/90 0.62 · Def contribs/90 6.55
Attack 69% · Defend 87%
(Nott'm Forest, Sunderland, Spurs)
xGI/90 0.57 · Def contribs/90 8.29
Attack 64% · Defend 81%
(Crystal Palace, Nott'm Forest, Man City)
xGI/90 0.72 · Def contribs/90 10.64
Attack 26% · Defend 67%
(Liverpool, Brighton, Nott'm Forest)
xGI/90 0.42 · Def contribs/90 4
Attack 50% · Defend 77%
(Man Utd, Brentford, Aston Villa)
xGI/90 0.43 · Def contribs/90 6.74
Attack 64% · Defend 83%
(Crystal Palace, Nott'm Forest, Man City)
🎯 Overall Forwards
xGI/90 0.54
Attack 95%
(Fulham, Crystal Palace, Burnley)
xGI/90 1.25
Attack 59%
(Everton, Aston Villa, Bournemouth)
xGI/90 0.7
Attack 10%
(Bournemouth, Arsenal, Brentford)
xGI/90 0.28
Attack 69%
(Nott'm Forest, Sunderland, Spurs)
xGI/90 0.47
Attack 31%
(West Ham, Liverpool, Crystal Palace)
🔍 Low-Ownership Defenders
xGI/90 0.24 · Def contribs/90 9.75
Attack 69% · Defend 69%
(Nott'm Forest, Sunderland, Spurs)
xGI/90 0.14 · Def contribs/90 9.98
Attack 75% · Defend 75%
(Wolves, Chelsea, Everton)
xGI/90 0.1 · Def contribs/90 8.57
Attack 90% · Defend 90%
(Newcastle, Man Utd, Leeds)
xGI/90 0.11 · Def contribs/90 10.63
Attack 80% · Defend 80%
(Sunderland, Burnley, Fulham)
xGI/90 0.1 · Def contribs/90 8.14
Attack 85% · Defend 85%
(Burnley, West Ham, Brighton)
🔍 Low-Ownership Midfielders
xGI/90 0.43 · Def contribs/90 6.74
Attack 64% · Defend 64%
(Crystal Palace, Nott'm Forest, Man City)
xGI/90 0.28 · Def contribs/90 4.43
Attack 69% · Defend 69%
(Nott'm Forest, Sunderland, Spurs)
xGI/90 0.35 · Def contribs/90 6.36
Attack 50% · Defend 50%
(Man Utd, Brentford, Aston Villa)
xGI/90 0.27 · Def contribs/90 9.62
Attack 64% · Defend 64%
(Crystal Palace, Nott'm Forest, Man City)
xGI/90 0.24 · Def contribs/90 11.29
Attack 50% · Defend 50%
(Man Utd, Brentford, Aston Villa)
🔍 Low-Ownership Forwards
xGI/90 0.7
Attack 10%
(Bournemouth, Arsenal, Brentford)
xGI/90 0.47
Attack 31%
(West Ham, Liverpool, Crystal Palace)
xGI/90 0.23
Attack 64%
(Crystal Palace, Nott'm Forest, Man City)
xGI/90 0.28
Attack 20%
(Spurs, Man City, Liverpool)
xGI/90 0.17
Attack 41%
(Leeds, Wolves, Arsenal)